↓ Skip to main content

Computed tomography during initial management and mortality among hemodynamically unstable blunt trauma patients: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computed tomography during initial management and mortality among hemodynamically unstable blunt trauma patients: a nationwide retrospective cohort study
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13049-017-0396-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yusuke Tsutsumi, Shingo Fukuma, Asuka Tsuchiya, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Yosuke Yamamoto, Sayaka Shimizu, Miho Kimachi, Shunichi Fukuhara

Abstract

Although many hemodynamically unstable trauma patients undergo computed tomography (CT) to identify a source of bleeding, this practice is currently only recommended by a few guidelines. To clarify whether CT has harmful effects among these patients, we examined the association between CT during initial management and mortality among unstable blunt trauma patients. This was a retrospective cohort study based on Japan Trauma Data Bank 2004-2014 registry data. Study population was adult blunt trauma patients with hypotension on arrival. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality. Two types of analyses were performed to adjust for confounding factors including propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) and instrumental variable (IV) analysis. Among 5,809 patients who met inclusion criteria, 5,352 (92.1%) underwent CT. The No CT group was more likely to have severe physiological conditions and lower probability of survival than those of the CT group. In IPTW analysis adjusting for measured confounders, we found a significant protective effect of undergoing CT on in-hospital mortality (excess deaths: -20.6 per 100 patients, 95% CI -26.2 to -14.9). In IV analysis adjusting both for measured and unmeasured confounders, the association between CT and mortality was not statistically significant (excess deaths: -4.1 per 100 patients, 95% CI -23.1 to 14.8). We did not find clinically meaningful harmful effect of CT on survival for unstable blunt trauma patients even after adjusting both for measured and unmeasured confounders. Our results did not support the recommendation of current guideline. We suggest physicians should consider CT as one of the diagnostic options even when patients are unstable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 53%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#13,047,522
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#757
of 1,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,646
of 315,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.