↓ Skip to main content

The promise and pitfalls of the internet for cognitive behavioral therapy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The promise and pitfalls of the internet for cognitive behavioral therapy
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-8-82
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerhard Andersson

Abstract

Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy is a promising new way to deliver psychological treatment. There are an increasing number of controlled trials in various fields such as anxiety disorders, mood disorders and health conditions such as headache and insomnia. Among the advantages for the field of cognitive behavior therapy is the dissemination of the treatment, being able to access treatment from a distance, and possibilities to tailor the interventions. To date, studies in which large effects have been obtained have included patient support from a clinician. Recent trials suggest that this support may come from non-clinicians and that therapist effects are minimal. Since studies also suggest that internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy can be equally effective as face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy, this is a finding that may have implications for CBT practitioners. However, there are other aspects to consider for implementation, as while clinicians may hold positive attitudes towards internet-delivered CBT a recent study suggested that patients are more skeptical and may prefer face-to-face treatment. In the present work, I argue that internet-delivered CBT may help to increase adherence to treatment protocols, that training can be facilitated by means of internet support, and that research on internet interventions can lead to new insights regarding what happens in regular CBT. Moreover, I conclude that internet-delivered CBT works best when support is provided, leaving an important role for clinicians who can incorporate internet treatment in their services. However, I also warn against disseminating internet-delivered CBT to patients for whom it is not suitable, and that clinical skills may suffer if clinicians are trained and practice mainly using the internet.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 225 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 18%
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 42 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 118 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 12%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 50 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2011.
All research outputs
#20,143,522
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,287
of 3,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,796
of 180,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.