You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annick AA Timmermans, Ryanne JM Lemmens, Maurice Monfrance, Richard PJ Geers, Wilbert Bakx, Rob JEM Smeets, Henk AM Seelen |
| Abstract |
Over fifty percent of stroke patients experience chronic arm hand performance problems, compromising independence in daily life activities and quality of life. Task-oriented training may improve arm hand performance after stroke, whereby augmented therapy may lead to a better treatment outcome. Technology-supported training holds opportunities for increasing training intensity. However, the effects of robot-supported task-oriented training with real life objects in stroke patients are not known to date. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness and added value of the Haptic Master robot combined with task-oriented arm hand training in chronic stroke patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 328 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 14% |
| Researcher | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 86 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 8% |
| Engineering | 22 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 100 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,547,039
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#245
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,431
of 239,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.