↓ Skip to main content

Genetic risk between the CACNA1I gene and schizophrenia in Chinese Uygur population

Overview of attention for article published in Hereditas, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic risk between the CACNA1I gene and schizophrenia in Chinese Uygur population
Published in
Hereditas, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41065-017-0037-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Xu, Yahui Liu, Jianhua Chen, Qingli Guo, Ke Liu, Zujia Wen, Zhaowei Zhou, Zhijian Song, Juan Zhou, Lin He, Qizhong Yi, Yongyong Shi

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a common mental disorder with high heritability, and genetic factors play a major role in the pathogenesis. Recent researches indicated that the CACNA1I involved in calcium channels probably affect the potential pathogenesis of SCZ. In this study, we attempted to investigate whether the CACNA1I gene contributes the risk to SCZ in the Uighur Chinese population, and performed a case-control study involving 985 patient samples and 1218 normal controls to analyze nine SNPs within the CACNA1I gene. Among these sites, six SNPs were significantly associated with SCZ in the allele distribution: rs132575 (adjusted Pallele  = 0.039, OR = 1.159), rs713860 (adjusted Pallele  = 0.039, OR = 0.792), rs738168 (adjusted Pallele  = 0.039, OR = 0.785), rs136805 (adjusted Pallele  = 0.014, OR = 1.212), rs5757760 (adjusted Pallele  = 0.042, OR = 0.873) and rs5750871 (adjusted Pallele  = 0.039, OR = 0.859). In addition, two SNPs turned to be risk factors for SCZ not only in the allele distribution, but also in the genotype distribution: rs132575 (adjusted Pgenotype  = 0.037) and rs136805 (adjusted Pgenotype  = 0.037). Overall, the present study provided evidence that significant association exists between the CACNA1I gene and SCZ in the Uighur Chinese population, subsequent validation of functional analysis and genetic association studies are needed to further extend this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Psychology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Hereditas
#444
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,511
of 307,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditas
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.