↓ Skip to main content

Reasons for encounter in young people consulting a family doctor in the French speaking part of Switzerland: a cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reasons for encounter in young people consulting a family doctor in the French speaking part of Switzerland: a cross sectional study
Published in
BMC Primary Care, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12875-015-0375-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Meynard, Barbara Broers, Danièle Lefebvre, Françoise Narring, Dagmar M. Haller

Abstract

Knowledge of patient's reasons for encounter is useful to inform health service planning and health professional education. Our aim was to describe reasons for encounter as stated by an unselected group of young people attending primary care practices in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. Consecutive patients aged between 15 and 24 years were recruited as part of the PRISM-Ado trial (n = 594). They completed an anonymous questionnaire in the waiting room, including their main reason for encounter (free text). Reasons for encounter were coded using ICPC-2 classification and analyzed according to sex, age and living in a rural or urban area. 95 % of questionnaires contained valid data about reasons for encounter (n = 567). General and unspecific (A) reasons were the most common in boys (44 %) and girls (42 %), followed by respiratory, musculoskeletal, dermatological and psychological reasons. Psychological reasons were more frequent in girls attending urban practices; musculoskeletal and dermatological reasons were more frequent in rural areas. Sexually transmitted infections or substance use were very rarely stated as a reason for encounter. This is the first study describing reasons for encounter as stated by young people themselves in primary care in Switzerland. These findings provide useful guidance for family doctors training and health service planning in Europe. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12608000432314 .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 22 35%