↓ Skip to main content

Beneficial effect of kidney transplantation from a deceased donor on severe chronic refractory intradialytic hypotension – a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beneficial effect of kidney transplantation from a deceased donor on severe chronic refractory intradialytic hypotension – a case report
Published in
BMC Nephrology, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12882-017-0662-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewa Ignacak, Dominik Cieniawski, Alina Bętkowska-Prokop, Czesław Osuch, Marek Kuźniewski, Władysław Sułowicz

Abstract

Chronic refractory hypotension (IDH, intradialytic hypotension) is a rare but serious problem encountered in patients on hemodialysis. Patients with chronic hypotension are often disqualified by transplant teams from renal transplantation. This is due to the possibility of an enormous risk of ischemic complications. We describe a 44-year old female patient with severe refractory hypotension (mean BP 60/30 mmHg, the lowest 48/28 mmHg), which appeared after bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy of the infected kidneys. The kidney transplantation from a deceased donor, with infusion of the two pressor amines (dopamine, dobutamine) was performed without technical complications and the blood pressure measurements were 100-120/70-80 mmHg. The immunosuppression regimen was tacrolimus (TAC) + mycophenolate mophetil (MMF) and steroids (GS). Pressor amines were discontinued on the 18th day after the transplantation. Because of delayed graft function, 4 hemodialysis treatments were performed. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the 22nd day with good function of the transplanted kidney (the concentration of serum creatinine 117 μmol/l). During one-year follow-up, the patient has been remaining stable with a very good graft function (serum creatinine 84 μmol/l) and normal blood pressure (115/70 mmHg). Proper preparation and adequate perioperative treatment allowed for safely performing kidney transplantation in the patient with severe IDH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,436,330
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#2,207
of 2,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,962
of 315,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#51
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.