↓ Skip to main content

The ethics of ‘Trials within Cohorts’ (TwiCs): 2nd international symposium

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ethics of ‘Trials within Cohorts’ (TwiCs): 2nd international symposium
Published in
Trials, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1961-0
Authors

Clare Relton, Maarten Burbach, Clive Collett, James Flory, Sophie Gerlich, Soren Holm, Amanda Hunn, Scott Y. Kim, Linda Kwakkenbos, Anne May, Jon Nicholl, Danny Young-Afat, Shaun Treweek, Rudolf Uher, Tjeerd van Staa, Joanne van der Velden, Helena Verkooijen, Andrew Vickers, Sophie Welch, Merrick Zwarenstein, Merrick Zwarenstein, Scott Kim, James Flory, Zachary Goodman, Søren Holm, Shaun Treweek, Sophie Gerlich, Anne M. May, Danny A. Young-Afat, Johannes P. Burbach, Carla H. van Gils, Rieke van der Graaf, Helena M. Verkooijen, Laura C. Coates, William Tillett, David Torgerson, Neil McHugh, Peter Taylor, Lesley Brown, Anne Heaven, John Young, Andrew Clegg, Kate Chatfield, Rudolf Uher, Anne M. May, Roxanne Gal, Evelyn M. Monninkhof, Danny A. Young Afat, Carla H. van Gils, Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Helena M. Verkooijen, Andrew Vickers, Linda Kwakkenbos, Marie-Eve Carrier, Brett D. Thombs, the SPIN investigators, Joanne M. van der Velden, A. Sophie Gerlich, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, Helena M. Verkooijen, Alice M. Couwenberg, Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Rieke van der Graaf, Johannes P. M. Burbach, Joanne M. van der Velden, Anne M. May, Helena M. Verkooijen, Emily Peckham, Suzanne Crossland, Tom Hughes, Alisha O’Connor, Imogen Sargent, Simon Gilbody

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 23%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Psychology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 40%