↓ Skip to main content

Comparative transcript profiling of the fertile and sterile flower buds of pol CMS in B. napus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative transcript profiling of the fertile and sterile flower buds of pol CMS in B. napus
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong An, Zonghui Yang, Bin Yi, Jing Wen, Jinxiong Shen, Jinxing Tu, Chaozhi Ma, Tingdong Fu

Abstract

The Polima (pol) system of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) and its fertility restoration gene Rfp have been used in hybrid breeding in Brassica napus, which has greatly improved the yield of rapeseed. However, the mechanism of the male sterility transition in pol CMS remains to be determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,226,756
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,262
of 10,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,713
of 225,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#134
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.