↓ Skip to main content

MS-DOCK: Accurate multiple conformation generator and rigid docking protocol for multi-step virtual ligand screening

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MS-DOCK: Accurate multiple conformation generator and rigid docking protocol for multi-step virtual ligand screening
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-9-184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Sauton, David Lagorce, Bruno O Villoutreix, Maria A Miteva

Abstract

The number of protein targets with a known or predicted tri-dimensional structure and of drug-like chemical compounds is growing rapidly and so is the need for new therapeutic compounds or chemical probes. Performing flexible structure-based virtual screening computations on thousands of targets with millions of molecules is intractable to most laboratories nor indeed desirable. Since shape complementarity is of primary importance for most protein-ligand interactions, we have developed a tool/protocol based on rigid-body docking to select compounds that fit well into binding sites.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 109 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 28%
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Master 15 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 20%
Chemistry 23 19%
Computer Science 11 9%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2011.
All research outputs
#12,846,160
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,776
of 7,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,811
of 81,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#33
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.