You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
U.S. adults are not meeting recommended levels for fish and omega-3 fatty acid intake: results of an analysis using observational data from NHANES 2003–2008
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-31 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yanni Papanikolaou, James Brooks, Carroll Reider, Victor L Fulgoni |
Abstract |
The American Heart Association's Strategic Impact Goal Through 2020 and Beyond recommends ≥ two 3.5-oz fish servings per week (preferably oily fish) partly to increase intake of omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). We examined the intake of total fish, fish high in omega-3 fatty acids, α-linolenic acid, EPA, and DHA in U.S. adults (19 + years) using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2008. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 42% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Turkey | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 192 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 18% |
Researcher | 25 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 17% |
Unknown | 31 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 4% |
Other | 40 | 21% |
Unknown | 44 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#194,187
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#75
of 1,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,568
of 230,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.