↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

U.S. adults are not meeting recommended levels for fish and omega-3 fatty acid intake: results of an analysis using observational data from NHANES 2003–2008

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
21 tweeters
patent
6 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
5 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Summary News Blogs Twitter Patents Facebook Google+ Video Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
U.S. adults are not meeting recommended levels for fish and omega-3 fatty acid intake: results of an analysis using observational data from NHANES 2003–2008
Published in
Nutrition Journal, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-13-31
Pubmed ID
24694001
Authors

Yanni Papanikolaou, James Brooks, Carroll Reider, Victor L Fulgoni

Abstract

The American Heart Association's Strategic Impact Goal Through 2020 and Beyond recommends ≥ two 3.5-oz fish servings per week (preferably oily fish) partly to increase intake of omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). We examined the intake of total fish, fish high in omega-3 fatty acids, α-linolenic acid, EPA, and DHA in U.S. adults (19 + years) using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2008.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 19%
Student > Master 34 18%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Other 14 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 39 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#178,764
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#69
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,535
of 226,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.