↓ Skip to main content

Prospective study of high-risk, BRCA1/2-mutation negative women: the ‘negative study’

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective study of high-risk, BRCA1/2-mutation negative women: the ‘negative study’
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Kotsopoulos, Kelly Metcalfe, Jill Alston, Dina Nikitina, Ophira Ginsburg, Andrea Eisen, Rochelle Demsky, Mohammad Akbari, Kevin Zbuk, Steven A Narod

Abstract

We previously reported that women from high-risk families who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation were four times more likely to develop breast cancer compared to women in the general population. Preventive measures and risk factors for breast cancer development in these high-risk women have not been evaluated to the same extent as BRCA1/2 positive women. Further, there is virtually no scientific evidence about best practices in their management and care. The proposed study will examine a role of genetic and non-genetic factors and develop the systems and parameters for the monitoring and surveillance necessary to help establish guidelines for the care of this high-risk population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,193,746
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,355
of 8,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,336
of 224,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#57
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,273 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.