↓ Skip to main content

Hemostasis during the early stages of trauma: comparison with disseminated intravascular coagulation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemostasis during the early stages of trauma: comparison with disseminated intravascular coagulation
Published in
Critical Care, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akiko Oshiro, Yuichiro Yanagida, Satoshi Gando, Naomi Henzan, Isao Takahashi, Hiroshi Makise

Abstract

We tested two hypotheses that disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and acute coagulopathy of trauma-shock (ACOTS) in the early phase of trauma are similar disease entities and that the DIC score on admission can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with coagulopathy of trauma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 19 28%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,876
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,831
of 238,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#139
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.