↓ Skip to main content

IQMNMR: Open source software using time-domain NMR data for automated identification and quantification of metabolites in batches

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IQMNMR: Open source software using time-domain NMR data for automated identification and quantification of metabolites in batches
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-12-337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu Song, Bo-Li Zhang, Hong-Min Liu, Bo-Yang Yu, Xiu-Mei Gao, Li-Yuan Kang

Abstract

One of the most promising aspects of metabolomics is metabolic modeling and simulation. Central to such applications is automated high-throughput identification and quantification of metabolites. NMR spectroscopy is a reproducible, nondestructive, and nonselective method that has served as the foundation of metabolomics studies. However, the automated high-throughput identification and quantification of metabolites in NMR spectroscopy is limited by severe spectral overlap. Although numerous software programs have been developed for resolving overlapping resonances, as well as for identifying and quantifying metabolites, most of these programs are frequency-domain methods, considerably influenced by phase shifts and baseline distortions, and effective only in small-scale studies. Almost all these programs require multiple spectra for each application, and do not automatically identify and quantify metabolites in batches.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 8%
Switzerland 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 35 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 35%
Engineering 5 13%
Chemistry 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 3 8%