You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multimodal analgesia versus traditional opiate based analgesia after cardiac surgery, a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-9-52 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sulman Rafiq, Daniel Andreas Steinbrüchel, Michael Jaeger Wanscher, Lars Willy Andersen, Albert Navne, Nikolaj Bang Lilleoer, Peter Skov Olsen |
Abstract |
To evaluate if an opiate sparing multimodal regimen of dexamethasone, gabapentin, ibuprofen and paracetamol had better analgesic effect, less side effects and was safe compared to a traditional morphine and paracetamol regimen after cardiac surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 156 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 13% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 18% |
Unknown | 48 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Unknown | 48 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,939,118
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#121
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,832
of 223,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.