↓ Skip to main content

A comparative effectiveness study of two culturally competent models of diabetes self-management programming for Latinos from low-income households

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Endocrine Disorders, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative effectiveness study of two culturally competent models of diabetes self-management programming for Latinos from low-income households
Published in
BMC Endocrine Disorders, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12902-017-0192-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Page-Reeves, Lidia Regino, Cristina Murray-Krezan, Molly Bleecker, Erik Erhardt, Mark Burge, Elaine Bearer, Shiraz Mishra

Abstract

Diabetes risk is extremely high for Latinos from low-income households. Health guidelines recommend that individuals learn strategies to self-manage their diabetes, but getting people to adopt required lifestyle changes is challenging and many people are not able to prevent their pre-diabetes from escalating or effectively control their diabetes. Systematic reviews show that culturally competent self-management programs can significantly improve diabetes outcomes and different models for culturally competent programming have been developed. This patient-engaged study will compare the effectiveness of two distinct evidence-based models for culturally competent diabetes health promotion at two sites that serve a large Latino patient population from low-income households: 1) The Diabetes Self-Management Support Empowerment Model, an educational session approach, and 2) The Chronic Care Model, a holistic community-based program. Data collection will involve interviews, focus groups, surveys and assessments of each program; and testing of patient participants for A1c, depression, Body Mass Index (BMI), and chronic stress with hair cortisol levels. We will recruit a total of 240 patient-social support pairs: Patients will be adults (men and women over the age of 18) who: 1.) Enter one of the two diabetes programs during the study; 2.) Self-identify as "Latino;" 3.) Are able to identify a social support person or key member of their social network who also agrees to participate with them; 4.) Are not pregnant (participants who become pregnant during the study will be excluded); and 5.) Have household income 250% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) or below. Social supports will be adults who are identified by the patient participants. Improved capacity for diabetes self-management measured through improvements in diabetes knowledge and diabetes-related patient activation. Successful diabetes self-management as measured by improvements in A1c, depression scale scores, BMI, and circulating levels of cortisol to determine chronic stress. Our hypothesis is that the program model that interfaces most synergistically with patients' culture and everyday life circumstances will have the best diabetes health outcomes. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on December 16, 2016 (Registration # NCT03004664 ).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 44 21%
Unknown 58 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 42 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 18%
Psychology 22 11%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,472,268
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#412
of 767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,186
of 316,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.