You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a behaviour change intervention: a case study on the practical application of theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Porcheret, Chris Main, Peter Croft, Robert McKinley, Andrew Hassell, Krysia Dziedzic |
| Abstract |
Use of theory in implementation of complex interventions is widely recommended. A complex trial intervention, to enhance self-management support for people with osteoarthritis (OA) in primary care, needed to be implemented in the Managing Osteoarthritis in Consultations (MOSAICS) trial. One component of the trial intervention was delivery by general practitioners (GPs) of an enhanced consultation for patients with OA. The aim of our case study is to describe the systematic selection and use of theory to develop a behaviour change intervention to implement GP delivery of the enhanced consultation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 189 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 17% |
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 28% |
| Psychology | 32 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,400,349
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,030
of 1,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,151
of 232,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#22
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.