↓ Skip to main content

Important prognostic factors for the long-term survival of lung cancer subjects in Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Important prognostic factors for the long-term survival of lung cancer subjects in Taiwan
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-8-324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tai-An Chiang, Ping-Ho Chen, Pei-Fen Wu, Tsu-Nai Wang, Po-Ya Chang, Albert Min-Shan Ko, Ming-Shyan Huang, Ying-Chin Ko

Abstract

This study used a large-scale cancer database in determination of prognostic factors for the survival of lung cancer subjects in Taiwan. Total of 24,910 subjects diagnosed with lung cancer was analysed. Survival estimates by Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional-hazards model estimated the death risk (hazard ratio (HR)) for various prognostic factors. The prognostic indicators associated with a higher risk of lung cancer deaths are male gender (males versus females; HR = 1.07, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.03-1.11), males diagnosed in later periods (shown in 1991-1994 versus 1987-1990; HR = 1.13), older age at diagnosis, large cell carcinoma (LCC)/small cell carcinoma (SCC), and supportive care therapy over chemotherapy. The overall 5-year survival rate for lung cancer death was significantly poorer for males (21.3%) than females (23.6%). Subjects with squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) and treatment by surgical resection alone had better prognosis. We find surgical resections to markedly increase 5-year survival rate from LCC, decreased risk of death from LCC, and no improved survival from SCC. Gender and clinical characteristics (i.e. diagnostic period, diagnostic age, histological type and treatment modality) play important roles in determining lung cancer survival.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 43%