↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for the practice and performance of manipulation under anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for the practice and performance of manipulation under anesthesia
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-22-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Gordon, Edward Cremata, Cheryl Hawk

Abstract

There are currently no widely accepted guidelines on standards for the practice of chiropractic or manual therapy manipulation under anesthesia, and the evidence base for this practice is composed primarily of lower-level evidence. The purpose of this project was to develop evidence-informed and consensus-based guidelines on spinal manipulation under anesthesia to address the gaps in the literature with respect to patient selection and treatment protocols.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 30%