↓ Skip to main content

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis versus proximal phalanx hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus: feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis versus proximal phalanx hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus: feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiren Maganlal Divecha, Aamir I Zubairy, James L Barrie, Shivashanker Aithal, Benjamin Fischer, Thomas Fanshawe, Asim Rajpura

Abstract

Osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (hallux rigidus) leads to pain and poor function and mobility. Arthrodesis is the gold standard treatment for end-stage disease. Total joint arthroplasties have been attempted, but early loosening has been attributed to dorsally directed shear forces on the metatarsal component. Metallic proximal phalangeal hemiarthroplasty theoretically avoids this. Whilst early results are promising, no comparative trials exist comparing this to arthrodesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 48%
Psychology 7 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 30%