↓ Skip to main content

Right and left ventricular function and myocardial scarring in adult patients with sickle cell disease: a comprehensive magnetic resonance assessment of hepatic and myocardial iron overload

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Right and left ventricular function and myocardial scarring in adult patients with sickle cell disease: a comprehensive magnetic resonance assessment of hepatic and myocardial iron overload
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flávia P Junqueira, Juliano L Fernandes, Guilherme M Cunha, Tadeu T A Kubo, Claudio M A O Lima, Daniel B P Lima, Marly Uellendhal, Sidney R Sales, Carolina A S Cunha, Viviani L R de Pessoa, Clarisse L C Lobo, Edson Marchiori

Abstract

Patients with Sickle cell disease (SCD) who receive regular transfusions are at risk for developing cardiac toxicity from iron overload. The aim of this study was to assess right and left cardiac volumes and function, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and iron deposits in patients with SCD using CMR, correlating these values with transfusion burden, ferritin and hemoglobin levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#16,967,134
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,061
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,990
of 214,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.