You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A non-surgical approach to the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: A prospective observational cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-7-16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Donald R Murphy, Eric L Hurwitz, Amy A Gregory, Ronald Clary |
Abstract |
While it is widely held that non-surgical management should be the first line of approach in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), little is known about the efficacy of non-surgical treatments for this condition. Data are needed to determine the most efficacious and safe non-surgical treatment options for patients with LSS. The purpose of this paper is to describe the clinical outcomes of a novel approach to patients with LSS that focuses on distraction manipulation (DM) and neural mobilization (NM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 56% |
United States | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
South Africa | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 245 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
Other | 40 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 13% |
Researcher | 31 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 10% |
Other | 53 | 21% |
Unknown | 32 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 58% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 16% |
Sports and Recreations | 11 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 5% |
Unknown | 33 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,457,189
of 24,058,913 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#871
of 4,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,641
of 72,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,058,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.