↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lay counsellor-delivered psychological treatments for harmful and dependent drinking and moderate to severe depression in primary care in India: PREMIUM…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lay counsellor-delivered psychological treatments for harmful and dependent drinking and moderate to severe depression in primary care in India: PREMIUM study protocol for randomized controlled trials
Published in
Trials, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vikram Patel, Benedict Weobong, Abhijit Nadkarni, Helen A Weiss, Arpita Anand, Smita Naik, Bhargav Bhat, Jesina Pereira, Ricardo Araya, Sona Dimidjian, Steven D Hollon, Michael King, Jim McCambridge, David McDaid, Pratima Murthy, Richard Velleman, Christopher G Fairburn, Betty Kirkwood

Abstract

The leading mental health causes of the global burden of disease are depression in women and alcohol use disorders in men. A major hurdle to the implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments in primary care in developing countries is the non-availability of skilled human resources. The aim of these trials is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two psychological treatments developed for the treatment of depression and alcohol use disorders in primary care in India.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 355 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 16%
Researcher 56 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Other 71 20%
Unknown 87 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Social Sciences 27 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 4%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 110 31%