↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of gefitinib as monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and very poor performance status

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of gefitinib as monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and very poor performance status
Published in
BMC Research Notes, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-1-102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhong Wei, Wang Mengzhao, Zhang Li, Li Longyun, Zhang Xiaotong

Abstract

This paper reports the outcome of gefitinib for Chinese advanced NSCLC patients with poor performance status (PS) at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital. From Oct 2002 to Apr. 2006, 42 advanced NSCLC patients with PS 3/4 received gefitinib 250 mg/day treatment. Median survival (MS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox regression model was used to find main factors affecting MS. Adverse events (AEs) were generally mild (grade 1 and 2) and reversible. The most frequent AEs were rash 72.2% (26/42) and diarrhea 44.4% (26/42). The objective tumor response rate and stable disease rate were 40.5% and 26.2% respectively, and median survival(MS) of all patients was 10.1 months (95% confidential interval CI, 3.4 ~ 16.8), and progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.5 ~ 6.9). The MS were significantly related with objective response of gefitinib. Objective responses was significantly related with rashes induced with gefitinib. Our study suggest that treatment with gefitinib may be well tolerated and beneficial for Chinese patients with poor PS, and the safety and efficacy were similar to patients with good PS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Postgraduate 2 25%
Student > Master 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%