↓ Skip to main content

Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 7,793)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
20 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
7 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
2467 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2237 Mendeley
citeulike
14 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-8-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolin Strobl, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Achim Zeileis, Torsten Hothorn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 33 1%
Germany 14 <1%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Canada 7 <1%
Italy 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Other 27 1%
Unknown 2128 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 535 24%
Researcher 384 17%
Student > Master 365 16%
Student > Bachelor 154 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 119 5%
Other 281 13%
Unknown 399 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 341 15%
Environmental Science 232 10%
Computer Science 226 10%
Engineering 193 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 107 5%
Other 608 27%
Unknown 530 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#782,053
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#45
of 7,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,777
of 178,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.