↓ Skip to main content

Neural Mobilization Reverses Behavioral and Cellular Changes That Characterize Neuropathic Pain in Rats

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Pain, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Mobilization Reverses Behavioral and Cellular Changes That Characterize Neuropathic Pain in Rats
Published in
Molecular Pain, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1744-8069-8-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio M Santos, Joyce T Silva, Aline C Giardini, Priscila A Rocha, Arnold PP Achermann, Adilson S Alves, Luiz RG Britto, Marucia Chacur

Abstract

The neural mobilization technique is a noninvasive method that has proved clinically effective in reducing pain sensitivity and consequently in improving quality of life after neuropathic pain. The present study examined the effects of neural mobilization (NM) on pain sensitivity induced by chronic constriction injury (CCI) in rats. The CCI was performed on adult male rats, submitted thereafter to 10 sessions of NM, each other day, starting 14 days after the CCI injury. Over the treatment period, animals were evaluated for nociception using behavioral tests, such as tests for allodynia and thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. At the end of the sessions, the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal cord were analyzed using immunohistochemistry and Western blot assays for neural growth factor (NGF) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 229 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 20%
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Professor 14 6%
Other 54 23%
Unknown 47 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 56 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,649,418
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#82
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,386
of 250,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#10
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.