↓ Skip to main content

Internalization and cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and carboxyl graphene nanoplatelets in the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Hep G2

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internalization and cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and carboxyl graphene nanoplatelets in the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Hep G2
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-10-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Lammel, Paul Boisseaux, Maria-Luisa Fernández-Cruz, José M Navas

Abstract

Graphene and graphene derivative nanoplatelets represent a new generation of nanomaterials with unique physico-chemical properties and high potential for use in composite materials and biomedical devices. To date little is known about the impact graphene nanomaterials may have on human health in the case of accidental or intentional exposure. The objective of this study was to assess the cytotoxic potential of graphene nanoplatelets with different surface chemistry towards a human hepatoma cell line, Hep G2, and identify the underlying toxicity targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 23%
Student > Master 33 13%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 45 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 31 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 11%
Materials Science 27 11%
Engineering 22 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Other 58 23%
Unknown 62 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,889,761
of 25,470,300 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#63
of 615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,836
of 207,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,470,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.