You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gene expression profiling of intestinal regeneration in the sea cucumber
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-10-262 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo A Ortiz-Pineda, Francisco Ramírez-Gómez, Judit Pérez-Ortiz, Sebastián González-Díaz, Francisco Santiago-De Jesús, Josue Hernández-Pasos, Cristina Del Valle-Avila, Carmencita Rojas-Cartagena, Edna C Suárez-Castillo, Karen Tossas, Ana T Méndez-Merced, José L Roig-López, Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga, José E García-Arrarás |
| Abstract |
Among deuterostomes, the regenerative potential is maximally expressed in echinoderms, animals that can quickly replace most injured organs. In particular, sea cucumbers are excellent models for studying organ regeneration since they regenerate their digestive tract after evisceration. However, echinoderms have been sidelined in modern regeneration studies partially because of the lack of genome-wide profiling approaches afforded by modern genomic tools.For the last decade, our laboratory has been using the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima to dissect the cellular and molecular events that allow for such amazing regenerative processes. We have already established an EST database obtained from cDNA libraries of normal and regenerating intestine at two different regeneration stages. This database now has over 7000 sequences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 23% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,491
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,673
of 10,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,236
of 114,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#25
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.