↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosing Kaposi’s Sarcoma (KS) in East Africa: how accurate are clinicians and pathologists?

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosing Kaposi’s Sarcoma (KS) in East Africa: how accurate are clinicians and pathologists?
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1750-9378-7-s1-p6
Authors

Erin Amerson, Nathan Buziba, Henry Wabinga, Megan Wenger, Mwebesa Bwana, Winnie Muyindike, Catherine Kyakwera, Miriam Laker, Edward Mbidde, Constantin Yiannoutsos, Kara Wools-Kaloustian, Beverly Musick, Philip LeBoit, Tim McCalmont, Beth Ruben, Paul Volberding, Toby Maurer, Jeffrey Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 25%
Other 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 32%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#120
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,424
of 162,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.