You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of clinical application of thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-12-157 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qing-Quan Luo, Hao Lin, Qiang Tan, Jia Huang, Lin Xu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#241
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,124
of 227,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#5
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.