↓ Skip to main content

Weighted-SAMGSR: combining significance analysis of microarray-gene set reduction algorithm with pathway topology-based weights to select relevant genes

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weighted-SAMGSR: combining significance analysis of microarray-gene set reduction algorithm with pathway topology-based weights to select relevant genes
Published in
Biology Direct, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13062-016-0152-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suyan Tian, Howard H. Chang, Chi Wang

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that a pathway-based feature selection method that incorporates biological information within pathways during the process of feature selection usually outperforms a gene-based feature selection algorithm in terms of predictive accuracy and stability. Significance analysis of microarray-gene set reduction algorithm (SAMGSR), an extension to a gene set analysis method with further reduction of the selected pathways to their respective core subsets, can be regarded as a pathway-based feature selection method. In SAMGSR, whether a gene is selected is mainly determined by its expression difference between the phenotypes, and partially by the number of pathways to which this gene belongs. It ignores the topology information among pathways. In this study, we propose a weighted version of the SAMGSR algorithm by constructing weights based on the connectivity among genes and then combing these weights with the test statistics. Using both simulated and real-world data, we evaluate the performance of the proposed SAMGSR extension and demonstrate that the weighted version outperforms its original version. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, the additional gene connectivity information does faciliatate feature selection. This article was reviewed by Drs. Limsoon Wong, Lev Klebanov, and, I. King Jordan.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Computer Science 2 9%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 9 41%