↓ Skip to main content

Hemoglobin Himeji and inconsistent hemoglobin A1c values: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemoglobin Himeji and inconsistent hemoglobin A1c values: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1377-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vânia Guedes, Rita Bettencourt-Silva, Joana Queirós, Maria da Luz Esteves, Maria José Teles, Davide Carvalho

Abstract

Hemoglobin A1c is used to evaluate the glycemic control in patients with diabetes and is a risk marker for chronic complications of diabetes. Hemoglobin variants are reported to falsely lower or increase hemoglobin A1c test results. We present a case report of a patient with diabetes with discrepancy between fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c due to the presence of hemoglobin Himeji, a clinically silent and very rare hemoglobinopathy. A 76-year-old white woman, born and living in Portugal, with type 2 diabetes presented to the family physician for a routine visit. She had no active complaints, including history or symptoms of hypoglycemia, and her physical examination was unremarkable. A review of her laboratory data showed fasting plasma glucose of 190 mg/dL and a hemoglobin A1c of 4.1%. The remaining blood test results were clinically insignificant; a further review of her laboratory data over the past 4 years revealed that her fasting plasma glucose had ranged from 130 to 250 mg/dL and hemoglobin A1c was consistently lower than 5%. A study of hemoglobins detected 32.8% of abnormal hemoglobin. Genetic sequencing identified a heterozygous mutation compatible with hemoglobin Himeji (c.422C>A; p.Ala141Asp). We tracked her family (three sons, six grandchildren, and two greatgrandchildren) for the presence of this hemoglobin variant, but none had this hemoglobinopathy. Despite the advantages of hemoglobin A1c in the follow-up and treatment of diabetes, the factors that interfere with its results must be known to ensure a correct estimation of the degree of glycemic control and a proper management of the disease. Therefore, health professionals should suspect the existence of hemoglobin variants when: the hemoglobin A1c value is above 15% or below the lower limit of its reference interval; there is a significant modification in its result coinciding with a change in assay methods; and there is a low correlation between plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c. In patients with hemoglobin Himeji, alternate ways of monitoring glycemic control (fructosamine or glycated serum albumin) should be used.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,438,227
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#3,509
of 3,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,793
of 317,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#48
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,942 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.