↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for histopathological specimen examination and diagnostic reporting of primary bone tumours

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Sarcoma Research, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for histopathological specimen examination and diagnostic reporting of primary bone tumours
Published in
Clinical Sarcoma Research, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/2045-3329-1-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

D Charles Mangham, Nicholas A Athanasou

Abstract

This review is intended to provide histopathologists with guidelines for clinical assessment, specimen handling and diagnostic reporting of benign and malignant primary bone tumours. Information from radiology, surgical, oncology and other clinical colleagues involved in the diagnosis and treatment of primary bone tumours should be properly assessed before undertaking a structured approach to specimen handling and histological reporting. This ensures that the information needed for planning appropriate treatment of these complex tumours is provided. Consistency in diagnostic evaluation with respect to both terminology and report content facilitates liaison at multidisciplinary bone tumour meetings and collaboration between cancer units and networks, as well as providing a common database for audit of the clinical, radiological and pathological aspects of bone tumours.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 2%
Nigeria 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 20 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,580,871
of 15,178,045 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#3
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,836
of 92,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,178,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them