↓ Skip to main content

Antagonistic interactions between honey bee bacterial symbionts and implications for disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antagonistic interactions between honey bee bacterial symbionts and implications for disease
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-6-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay D Evans, Tamieka-Nicole Armstrong

Abstract

Honey bees, Apis mellifera, face many parasites and pathogens and consequently rely on a diverse set of individual and group-level defenses to prevent disease. One route by which honey bees and other insects might combat disease is through the shielding effects of their microbial symbionts. Bees carry a diverse assemblage of bacteria, very few of which appear to be pathogenic. Here we explore the inhibitory effects of these resident bacteria against the primary bacterial pathogen of honey bees, Paenibacillus larvae.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 210 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 23%
Researcher 49 21%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Master 23 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 13%
Environmental Science 10 4%
Chemistry 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 39 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,437
of 85,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.