↓ Skip to main content

Students’ perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Students’ perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther M Bergman, Anique BH de Bruin, Andreas Herrler, Inge WH Verheijen, Albert JJA Scherpbier, Cees PM van der Vleuten

Abstract

To get insight in how theoretical knowledge is transformed into clinical skills, important information may arise from mapping the development of anatomical knowledge during the undergraduate medical curriculum. If we want to gain a better understanding of teaching and learning in anatomy, it may be pertinent to move beyond the question of how and consider also the what, why and when of anatomy education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 240 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Student > Master 22 9%
Lecturer 22 9%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 71 29%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 41%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 60 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,156,892
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,014
of 3,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,323
of 302,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.