↓ Skip to main content

Association between perceived fatigue and gait parameters measured by an instrumented treadmill in people with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between perceived fatigue and gait parameters measured by an instrumented treadmill in people with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12984-015-0028-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alon Kalron

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a multi-focal progressive disorder of the central nervous system often resulting in diverse clinical manifestations. Symptomatic fatigue is quite common in people with MS (PwMS), with prevalence as high as 85%. Nevertheless, it remains poorly understood and its association with walking capabilities unclear. Therefore, the objective of this investigation was to examine the relationship between symptomatic fatigue and spatio-temporal parameters of gait in PwMS based on an instrumented treadmill. One hundred and twenty-four relapsing-remitting patients diagnosed with MS, 84 women and 40 men aged 42.6 (S.D = 11.9), participated in this investigation. A convenience sample of 25 apparently healthy subjects, 15 women and 10 men aged 40.3 (S.D = 11.1), served as controls. Gait spatiotemporal parameters were obtained using the Zebris FDM-T Treadmill (Zebris1 Medical GmbH, Germany). The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), a self-reported questionnaire, was used to determine the level of symptomatic fatigue in the MS study group. PwMS were divided into two groups: fatigued and non-fatigued. Forty-four PwMS were classified as suffering from fatigue (mean MFIS = 52.0, S.D = 13.7); 80 were classified as non-fatigued (mean MFIS = 14.5, S.D = 14.5). Individuals in the fatigued group walked slower than those in the non-fatigued group; 1.7 (S.D = 2.4) vs. 2.4 (S.D = 1.0); P < 0.001, respectively. Moreover, fatigued patients took smaller steps, had a shorter stride length, prolonged stance, double support phase and a shorter single support phase compared to the non-fatigued group. In the total group, fatigue was significantly correlated with 10 (out of 14) spatiotemporal parameters of gait, however, correlation scores <0.40 were considered as weak correlations. According to step one of the linear logistic regression analysis, the temporal gait component was found to explain 5.1% of the variance related to symptomatic fatigue, R2 = 0.051, χ2 (1) = 6.511, P = 0.011. Step two of the model added the gait spatial component, thus increasing the explaining variance to 9.3%; R2 = 0.093, χ2 (2) = 12.12, P = 0.002. The asymmetry gait parameter did not contribute to the equation. Perceived fatigue is related to walking speed in PwMS, nevertheless its contribution to level of fatigue is limited.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 123 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 19%
Engineering 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 45 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,502,302
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#402
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,518
of 264,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.