↓ Skip to main content

Lyme arthritis in Southern Norway - an endemic area for Lyme Borreliosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lyme arthritis in Southern Norway - an endemic area for Lyme Borreliosis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-185
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glenn Haugeberg, Inger Johanne W Hansen, Tone Skarpaas, Sølvi Noraas, Vivian Kjelland

Abstract

Despite Southern Norway is an endemic area for Lyme borreliosis there is a lack of data on Lyme arthritis (LA). In the literature controversies exist if acute LA can develop into chronic arthritis. Our objective was to identify and characterize patients with LA in Southern Norway and explore disease course after antibiotic treatment.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 5 11%
Librarian 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,700,036
of 23,544,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#827
of 7,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,740
of 227,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#20
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.