↓ Skip to main content

Predicting and mapping malaria under climate change scenarios: the potential redistribution of malaria vectors in Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting and mapping malaria under climate change scenarios: the potential redistribution of malaria vectors in Africa
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henri EZ Tonnang, Richard YM Kangalawe, Pius Z Yanda

Abstract

Malaria is rampant in Africa and causes untold mortality and morbidity. Vector-borne diseases are climate sensitive and this has raised considerable concern over the implications of climate change on future disease risk. The problem of malaria vectors (Anopheles mosquitoes) shifting from their traditional locations to invade new zones is an important concern. The vision of this study was to exploit the sets of information previously generated by entomologists, e.g. on geographical range of vectors and malaria distribution, to build models that will enable prediction and mapping the potential redistribution of Anopheles mosquitoes in Africa.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 317 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 16%
Researcher 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 46 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 64 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 23%
Environmental Science 55 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 12%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 3%
Other 61 18%
Unknown 79 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#2,041,997
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#422
of 5,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,551
of 95,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.