You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Arithmetic mismatch negativity and numerical magnitude processing in number matching
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-12-83 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yi-Fang Hsu, Dénes Szücs |
Abstract |
This study examined the relationship of the arithmetic mismatch negativity (AMN) and the semantic evaluation of numerical magnitude. The first question was whether the AMN was sensitive to the incongruity in numerical information per se, or rather, to the violation of strategic expectations. The second question was whether the numerical distance effect could appear independently of the AMN. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants decided whether two digits were matching or non-matching in terms of physical similarity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 26% |
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Professor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 16 | 42% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 11% |
Linguistics | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,557,505
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#664
of 1,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,841
of 122,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.