↓ Skip to main content

Strategies towards sequencing complex crop genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies towards sequencing complex crop genomes
Published in
Genome Biology, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-11-322
Pubmed ID
Authors

James C Abbott, Sarah A Butcher

Abstract

ABSTRACT: A report on the Strategies for de novo assemblies of complex crop genomes workshop held at The Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich, UK, 8-10 October 2012.

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,799
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,602
of 285,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#29
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.