↓ Skip to main content

Assisting drinking with an affordable BCI-controlled wearable robot and electrical stimulation: a preliminary investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assisting drinking with an affordable BCI-controlled wearable robot and electrical stimulation: a preliminary investigation
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ritik Looned, Jacob Webb, Zheng Gang Xiao, Carlo Menon

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to demonstrate, through tests with healthy volunteers, the feasibility of potentially assisting individuals with neurological disorders via a portable assistive technology for the upper extremities (UE). For this purpose the task of independently drinking a glass of water was selected, as it is one of the most basic and vital activities of the daily living that is unfortunately not achievable by individuals severely affected by stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 22%
Student > Master 53 22%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 44 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 91 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Neuroscience 20 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Computer Science 13 5%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 54 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2014.
All research outputs
#13,712,309
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#673
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,875
of 227,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.