You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
Quod erat demonstrandum?The mystery of experimental validation of apparently erroneous computational analyses of protein sequences
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2001
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2001-2-12-research0051 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lakshminarayan M Iyer, L Aravind, Peer Bork, Kay Hofmann, Arcady R Mushegian, Igor B Zhulin, Eugene V Koonin |
Abstract |
Computational predictions are critical for directing the experimental study of protein functions. Therefore it is paradoxical when an apparently erroneous computational prediction seems to be supported by experiment. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 8% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Hungary | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 72 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 39% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 11% |
Professor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 48% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 19% |
Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 14% |