↓ Skip to main content

Quod erat demonstrandum?The mystery of experimental validation of apparently erroneous computational analyses of protein sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quod erat demonstrandum?The mystery of experimental validation of apparently erroneous computational analyses of protein sequences
Published in
Genome Biology, November 2001
DOI 10.1186/gb-2001-2-12-research0051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lakshminarayan M Iyer, L Aravind, Peer Bork, Kay Hofmann, Arcady R Mushegian, Igor B Zhulin, Eugene V Koonin

Abstract

Computational predictions are critical for directing the experimental study of protein functions. Therefore it is paradoxical when an apparently erroneous computational prediction seems to be supported by experiment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 8%
France 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 11%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 19%
Computer Science 5 6%
Chemistry 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 12 14%