You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fever management in intensive care patients with infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul J Young, Manoj Saxena |
| Abstract |
With great interest we read the article by Dr Schoeneberg and colleagues regarding gender-specific differences with respect to outcome in patients with severe traumatic injury. The authors show that, apart from the acute phase after trauma, women have a more favorable trauma severity-adjusted outcome, with shorter ICU and hospital stay and lower sepsis rates. However, a possible mechanism of action behind this difference was not suggested. We hypothesize that, in view of the fact that morbidity and mortality in the post-acute phase after trauma are often caused by infectious complications, gender differences in immunity might explain the observed differences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 16% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 28% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,750,557
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,537
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,147
of 249,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.