You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-87 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan M Souza, Rolf J Sebaldt, Jean A Mackay, Jeanette C Prorok, Lorraine Weise-Kelly, Tamara Navarro, Nancy L Wilczynski, R Brian Haynes, the CCDSS Systematic Review Team |
| Abstract |
Computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) are claimed to improve processes and outcomes of primary preventive care (PPC), but their effects, safety, and acceptance must be confirmed. We updated our previous systematic reviews of CCDSSs and integrated a knowledge translation approach in the process. The objective was to review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of CCDSSs for PPC on process of care, patient outcomes, harms, and costs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 293 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 23% |
| Unknown | 46 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 38% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 61 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2014.
All research outputs
#6,042,254
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,021
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,475
of 120,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.