↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral weight-loss treatment plus motivational interviewing versus attention control: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Behavioral weight-loss treatment plus motivational interviewing versus attention control: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2094-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin L. Moss, Leah N. Tobin, Tavis S. Campbell, Kristin M. von Ranson

Abstract

Studies evaluating the benefit of adding motivational interviewing (MI) to behavioral weight-loss programs (BWLPs) have yielded mixed findings. The aims of this randomized controlled trial were to: (1) assess the efficacy of adding MI to a BWLP on weight loss and adherence among 135 individuals with overweight and obesity (77.8% female; mean BMI = 33.6 kg/m(2)) enrolled in a 12-week BWLP and (2) explore levels of importance, confidence, and readiness for change ratings. Participants, who were randomized to receive two MI sessions or two attention control sessions, were assessed at baseline, the end of the BWLP, and 6 months post BWLP. Both groups decreased their weight from baseline to the end of the BWLP; however, there was no weight change in either group when measured between baseline and 6 months post BWLP. We observed no group differences in importance, confidence, and readiness for change after each session. We highlight some important lessons learned from the present trial that can be applied to MI + BWLP research. Participants may not have benefited from MI because they were already highly motivated to change, which highlights the importance of pretreatment assessment. Findings also suggest that treatment monitoring may help to enhance MI + BWLP efficacy by guiding a stepped-care approach that identifies individuals for whom additional MI sessions are needed, and when. A focus on refining elements of treatment remains an important direction. ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02649634 . Retrospectively registered on 5 January 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 40 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Psychology 14 11%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 45 36%