You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classification of transient behaviours in a time-dependent toggle switch model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-8-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Berta Verd, Anton Crombach, Johannes Jaeger |
| Abstract |
Waddington's epigenetic landscape is an intuitive metaphor for the developmental and evolutionary potential of biological regulatory processes. It emphasises time-dependence and transient behaviour. Nowadays, we can derive this landscape by modelling a specific regulatory network as a dynamical system and calculating its so-called potential surface. In this sense, potential surfaces are the mathematical equivalent of the Waddingtonian landscape metaphor. In order to fully capture the time-dependent (non-autonomous) transient behaviour of biological processes, we must be able to characterise potential landscapes and how they change over time. However, currently available mathematical tools focus on the asymptotic (steady-state) behaviour of autonomous dynamical systems, which restricts how biological systems are studied. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Norway | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 31% |
| Researcher | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 22% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,810,825
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#186
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,863
of 227,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.