↓ Skip to main content

Aprepitant for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma-associated pruritus: 4 cases and a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aprepitant for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma-associated pruritus: 4 cases and a review of the literature
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3194-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna S. Song, Marianne Tawa, Nicole G. Chau, Thomas S. Kupper, Nicole R. LeBoeuf

Abstract

Aprepitant is an FDA-approved medication for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. It blocks substance P binding to neurokinin-1; substance P has been implicated in itch pathways both as a local and global mediator. We report a series of four patients, diagnosed with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, who experienced full body pruritus recalcitrant to standard therapies. All patients experienced rapid symptom improvement (within days) following aprepitant treatment. Aprepitant has been shown in small studies to be efficacious for treating chronic and malignancy-associated pruritus. Prior studies have shown no change in clinical efficacy of chemotherapeutics with concurrent aprepitant administration. These cases further demonstrate that aprepitant can be considered as a therapeutic option in malignancy-associated pruritus and further support the need for larger clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,710,653
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,401
of 8,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,283
of 312,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#67
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.