↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the heterogeneity of effects of corticosteroids on acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the heterogeneity of effects of corticosteroids on acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13819
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheng-Yuan Ruan, Hsien-Ho Lin, Chun-Ta Huang, Ping-Hung Kuo, Huey-Dong Wu, Chong-Jen Yu

Abstract

The effectiveness of corticosteroid therapy on the mortality of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains under debate. We aimed to explore the grounds for the inconsistent results in previous studies and update the evidence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 15 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,257,445
of 21,362,911 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,468
of 5,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,520
of 207,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#27
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,362,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.