↓ Skip to main content

Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
578 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
884 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andy P Dickens, Suzanne H Richards, Colin J Greaves, John L Campbell

Abstract

Targeting social isolation in older people is a growing public health concern. The proportion of older people in society has increased in recent decades, and it is estimated that approximately 25% of the population will be aged 60 or above within the next 20 to 40 years. Social isolation is prevalent amongst older people and evidence indicates the detrimental effect that it can have on health and wellbeing. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of interventions designed to alleviate social isolation and loneliness in older people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 884 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 11 1%
United States 4 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 855 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 162 18%
Student > Bachelor 128 14%
Researcher 121 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 5%
Other 157 18%
Unknown 180 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 144 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 134 15%
Psychology 116 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 11%
Computer Science 26 3%
Other 139 16%
Unknown 228 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,056,604
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,164
of 17,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,279
of 135,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#7
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.