↓ Skip to main content

Engaging students and faculty: implications of self-determination theory for teachers and leaders in academic medicine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engaging students and faculty: implications of self-determination theory for teachers and leaders in academic medicine
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey M Lyness, Stephen J Lurie, Denham S Ward, Christopher J Mooney, David R Lambert

Abstract

Much of the work of teachers and leaders at academic health centers involves engaging learners and faculty members in shared goals. Strategies to do so, however, are seldom informed by empirically-supported theories of human motivation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 147 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 45 29%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 39%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Psychology 14 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 6 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,732
of 3,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,412
of 213,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.