↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Importin 8 (IPO8) as the most accurate reference gene for the clinicopathological analysis of lung specimens

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Importin 8 (IPO8) as the most accurate reference gene for the clinicopathological analysis of lung specimens
Published in
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, November 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2199-9-103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul A Nguewa, Jackeline Agorreta, David Blanco, Maria Dolores Lozano, Javier Gomez-Roman, Blas A Sanchez, Iñaki Valles, Maria J Pajares, Ruben Pio, Maria Jose Rodriguez, Luis M Montuenga, Alfonso Calvo

Abstract

The accurate normalization of differentially expressed genes in lung cancer is essential for the identification of novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers by real time RT-PCR and microarrays. Although classical "housekeeping" genes, such as GAPDH, HPRT1, and beta-actin have been widely used in the past, their accuracy as reference genes for lung tissues has not been proven. We have conducted a thorough analysis of a panel of 16 candidate reference genes for lung specimens and lung cell lines. Gene expression was measured by quantitative real time RT-PCR and expression stability was analyzed with the softwares GeNorm and NormFinder, mean of |Delta Ct| (= |Ct Normal-Ct tumor|) +/- SEM, and correlation coefficients among genes. Systematic comparison between candidates led us to the identification of a subset of suitable reference genes for clinical samples: IPO8, ACTB, POLR2A, 18S, and PPIA. Further analysis showed that IPO8 had a very low mean of |Delta Ct| (0.70 +/- 0.09), with no statistically significant differences between normal and malignant samples and with excellent expression stability. Our data show that IPO8 is the most accurate reference gene for clinical lung specimens. In addition, we demonstrate that the commonly used genes GAPDH and HPRT1 are inappropriate to normalize data derived from lung biopsies, although they are suitable as reference genes for lung cell lines. We thus propose IPO8 as a novel reference gene for lung cancer samples.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Canada 1 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 38 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#136
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,427
of 179,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.